Archive for the ‘Cool stuff’ Category

Nanocrystal conductors could lead to massive, robust 3-D storage

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

When I was a child, watching various sci-fi movies, I was dreaming of how matter would be organized on those blocky crystals they showed off as storage for endless quantities of information. Well, it seems we’re getting there now:

Rice University scientists have created the first two-terminal memory chips that use only silicon, one of the most common substances on the planet, in a way that should be easily adaptable to nanoelectronic manufacturing techniques and promises to extend the limits of miniaturization subject to Moore’s Law.

Last year, researchers in the lab of Rice Professor James Tour showed how electrical current could repeatedly break and reconnect 10-nanometer strips of graphite, a form of carbon, to create a robust, reliable memory “bit.” At the time, they didn’t fully understand why it worked so well.

Now, they do. A new collaboration by the Rice labs of professors Tour, Douglas Natelson and Lin Zhong proved the circuit doesn’t need the carbon at all.

Jun Yao, a graduate student in Tour’s lab and primary author of the paper that appears today in the online edition of Nano Letters, confirmed his breakthrough idea when he sandwiched a layer of silicon oxide, an insulator, between semiconducting sheets of polycrystalline silicon that served as the top and bottom electrodes.

Applying a charge to the electrodes created a conductive pathway by stripping oxygen atoms from the silicon oxide and forming a chain of nano-sized silicon crystals. Once formed, the chain can be repeatedly broken and reconnected by applying a pulse of varying voltage.

The nanocrystal wires are as small as 5 nanometers (billionths of a meter) wide, far smaller than circuitry in even the most advanced computers and electronic devices.

“The beauty of it is its simplicity,” said Tour, Rice’s T.T. and W.F. Chao Chair in Chemistry as well as a professor of mechanical engineering and materials science and of computer science. That, he said, will be key to the technology’s scalability. Silicon oxide switches or memory locations require only two terminals, not three (as in flash memory), because the physical process doesn’t require the device to hold a charge.

It also means layers of silicon-oxide memory can be stacked in tiny but capacious three-dimensional arrays. “I’ve been told by industry that if you’re not in the 3-D memory business in four years, you’re not going to be in the memory business. This is perfectly suited for that,” Tour said.

Silicon-oxide memories are compatible with conventional transistor manufacturing technology, said Tour, who recently attended a workshop by the National Science Foundation and IBM on breaking the barriers to Moore’s Law, which states the number of devices on a circuit doubles every 18 to 24 months.

“Manufacturers feel they can get pathways down to 10 nanometers. Flash memory is going to hit a brick wall at about 20 nanometers. But how do we get beyond that? Well, our technique is perfectly suited for sub-10-nanometer circuits,” he said.

How Much Smaller Can Chips Go?

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

Seven of the finest minds Intel can muster are lined up on stage, ready to take questions from a pack of visibly intimidated European journalists.

These are Intel fellows – the highest rank of technical merit afforded to the company’s engineers – whose CVs are stuffed with PhDs and patents in the places that most people put fillers such as “excellent typing skills” and “interest in badminton”.

Finally, one of the press pack plucks up the courage to ask a question. Is Moore’s Law – Gordon Moore’s legendary prediction that the number of transistors on a processor will double every two years – dead? One or two of the fellows chuckle politely, others are visibly irritated. Almost all are eager to grab the microphone and put the impertinent questioner straight.

One by one, they deliver measured and witty responses. “The number of people predicting the end of Moore’s Law doubles every two years,” quips the Scandinavian Tryggve Fossum, before American fellow Karl Kempf delivers a cutting dénouement. “The first microprocessor had 2,300 transistors, now we have processors with 2.3 billion transistors. That’s Moore’s Law. That’s what we do.”

Indeed, it’s what Intel’s been doing for more than 30 years. Now, the company is preparing to defy the laws of physics to “print” its next generation of chips. Chips so crammed with transistors that the machinery is working with sub-atomic precision to make them.

But when you’re already working with transistors a fraction of the size of a virus cell, how much further can you push the miniaturisation before the plucky journalist’s predicted demise of Moore’s Law comes true?

The complexity of a modern processor is almost beyond comprehension. A working 1GHz core on ARM’s latest Cortex A9 processors occupies less than 1.5mm2, using the 65nm production process. To put that into perspective: a nanometre is a billionth of a metre, which means a nanometre is to a tennis ball what a tennis ball is to the planet Earth.

“Microscopic” doesn’t even come close.

Yet, if that sounds impossibly fiddly, Intel’s latest Core processors are built using a 32nm process. While you might just be able to spot one of ARM’s cores with the naked eye, to see one of the 32nm transistors on an Intel chip, you would need to enlarge the processor to beyond the size of a house.

Working at such precision is an enormous challenge for chip manufacturers. As processes are refined every two years to keep Moore’s Law alive, Intel’s engineers are forced to show remarkable levels of ingenuity to keep processors ticking. “The end has been predicted many times, and we have shown this is not the case,” said Intel fellow Jose Maiz. “At least, not yet.”

Read full article: http://www.pcpro.co.uk

The Art of Failure 2010

Wednesday, August 18th, 2010

When a microchip is born during the prototyping phase, it doesn’t always come out as expected. Analysis of these failures often brings to the eye very peculiar images.. Check the slideshow below!

Just as one man’s trash is another man’s treasure, one person’s systems failure is another one’s masterpiece. This is the third year that the “Art of Failure Analysis”was featured at the IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA). Participants submitted the most intriguing images they’d captured during chip autopsies. Favorite pictures from the collection, which range from charming to just plain creepy, were on display at the symposium from 5 to 9 July in Singapore.

Source: http://spectrum.ieee.org